The Reeder 44-40 Review...A Dream Gun...

Huey
[subject]
Thursday, October 24, 2019, 12:57 (2499 days ago)

I may well be the only Misfit to get worked up about getting a new gun in an obsolete caliber. But, I gotta be me so the story goes.

The will be a long, drawn out multiple post review. Simple reason is there is a lot to tell.

The 44-40 suffers from many of the same none standard dimensions of many of the old hyphenated cartridges. So, here goes.

Originally loaded with .426" bullets caused problems as barrel dimensions became standard .429" with the 44 Special and later the 44 Magnum.

Gunsmiths started trying to "fix" this, but many got it wrong. They built 44-40s with .431" throats, but failed to change the neck dimensions to allow cartridges to seat when loaded with bullets over .427". This made an existing problem worse.

This has slowly corrected itself through the years. My Colt New Frontier 44-40 has .431" throats and my Uberti Flattop Target 44-40 has .4305" throats. Both allow proper bullets to seat and shoot lights out.

Enter the Reeder 44-40. It arrived today and has proper .431" throats and chambers correct bullets just fine.

But, the similarities end there. The Reeder gun is built brute strong on the Ruger Blackhawk Frame.

A few debate this and I make no recommendations. But the weak spot of a six shot cylinder is at the lock notch.

I don't have the knowledge or equipment of the custom gunsmiths. But, common sense comes into play.

Measuring the cylinder thickness at the bottom of the notch came in as follows. Ruger Blackhawk 45 Colt .052". Ruger Super Blackhawk 44 Magnum .070". Reeder 44-40 .065".

In my calculations this puts the strength more in line with a 44 Magnum than a 45 Colt. I'll likely limit my loads to 30,000 psi out of respect for the brass thickness. But, no reason this fine old cartridge can't receive the same performance boost as the old 45 Colt in the Ruger Blackhawk.

44-40 Part 2...

Huey
[subject]
Thursday, October 24, 2019, 13:07 (2499 days ago) @ Huey

The Reeder gun is fit very tight and smoothly. Lock up is tight, alignment is perfect and grip fit exceeds all 26 of my prior Reeder builds. Of course, several of these guns were purchased from Gary not having been built for me.

The gun came with a gold bead front and v-notch rear sight which I do not shoot well. They are good for quick shooting and appropriate for a "Trail Gun." My first three groups were 1.5". Me being the limiting factor, not the gun.

An added and unexpected bonus is the 44-40 cylinder fits my factory SBH as well as the Reeder Gun. Hard to believe with the custom Reeder barrel. Both guns have a .002" barrel gap which is like an added Christmas Present.

I'll defy the usual norm and try this fine gun loaded with 300 grn GT Hollow Point Bullets. Think this gun may just give the old 45 Colt a run for it's money.

The sheer luxury and nostalgic chamberings of this fine revolver means it's not for sale.

44-40 Part 3...

Huey
[subject]
Thursday, October 24, 2019, 13:31 (2499 days ago) @ Huey

At the end of the shooting session, I had to try it.

Putting the Reeder 44-40 Cylinder in my factory Ruger SBH, I returned to the bench.

Groups were much closer to 1". I believe this is the result of a longer sight radius and more target friendly sights.

It's nice to know I can interchange these cylinder for much greater versatility.

The Reeder 44-40 was a major score. Glad I wasn't 3 minutes later calling. But, that's another story.

Huey’s 44-40

Robt
[subject]
Thursday, October 24, 2019, 14:45 (2499 days ago) @ Huey

Thanks for your posts regarding the 44-40 cartridge. I learned a lot that may favor my looking for a 44-40 carbine and six gun.

Also, don't fall for the weak case B.S...

Huey
[subject]
Thursday, October 24, 2019, 14:48 (2499 days ago) @ Robt

That may well be true with the Winchester or Remington cases. But, different story with the great Starline Brass.

I see a Reeder 44-40 Carbine in my future too...

FOR ALL THE DASH SIXGUN CARTRIDGES

JT
[subject]
Thursday, October 24, 2019, 15:59 (2499 days ago) @ Huey

.44-40, .38-40, AND .32-20 STARLINE IS IT! I WISH THEY MADE .25-20.

Amen to that...

Huey
[subject]
Thursday, October 24, 2019, 16:01 (2499 days ago) @ JT

- No text -

Get both in one gun..a revolving carbine!

Woody
[subject]
Thursday, October 24, 2019, 20:58 (2498 days ago) @ Robt

- No text -

Huey, that’s great information.

BlackPete
[subject]
Thursday, October 24, 2019, 13:32 (2499 days ago) @ Huey

- No text -

Huey I think you may be ready to do some magazine articles.

ChrisG
[subject]
Thursday, October 24, 2019, 13:36 (2499 days ago) @ Huey

I'd read them at least!

Plus

Paul
[subject]
Thursday, October 24, 2019, 13:39 (2499 days ago) @ Huey

That 44-40 was one awesome looking gun!

Exactly Right!!! This gun means more to me than a new...

Huey
[subject]
Thursday, October 24, 2019, 13:49 (2499 days ago) @ Paul

Freedom Arms 454 Casull would. As JT mentioned above, it proves this fine old round can still get the job done.

Gary's engraving of a Bear's Print is more appropriate than the Magnum Crowd would admit to.

OBSOLETE CALIBER? .44-40 IS NOT OBSOLETE !

JT
[subject]
Thursday, October 24, 2019, 13:44 (2499 days ago) @ Huey

- No text -

Not for us, but many claim it is!!! Many publications...

Huey
[subject]
Thursday, October 24, 2019, 13:46 (2499 days ago) @ JT

List it as obsolete. You believing it's not is exactly why I renewed my Guns Magazine Subscription...

IS THERE ANYTHING TO BE DONE IN

JT
[subject]
Thursday, October 24, 2019, 13:48 (2499 days ago) @ Huey

THE LOWER 48 WHICH CANNOT BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH A .44-40?

Actually JT, I think it would work beyond even that...

Huey
[subject]
Thursday, October 24, 2019, 13:51 (2499 days ago) @ JT

Maybe not the best choice for all situations, but more capabilities than commonly thought.

Especially in a modern revolver with modern components.

Amede
[subject]
Thursday, October 24, 2019, 16:06 (2499 days ago) @ Huey

- No text -

Its too new for me, the 45 colt seems

Amede
[subject]
Thursday, October 24, 2019, 15:32 (2499 days ago) @ JT

to be a year older. I'd go with that.

BOTH ARRIVED IN 1873

JT
[subject]
Thursday, October 24, 2019, 15:58 (2499 days ago) @ Amede

- No text -

Thrilling to load and shoot them 146 years later...

Huey
[subject]
Thursday, October 24, 2019, 16:04 (2499 days ago) @ JT

- No text -

You know more than me on this, but I have read

Amede
[subject]
Thursday, October 24, 2019, 16:06 (2499 days ago) @ JT

that it was out in '72 but the army adopted it in '73. Maybe its mute as for general consumption may have been '73. Either way, I'm just pokin fun at y'all. I love the old cartridges and the more I shoot, the more I drift to shooting them and appreciating their performance.

powered by my little forum