Does anyone know if Marlin ever
Larry Fry
[subject]
Monday, January 13, 2020, 15:36 (2416 days ago)
made a lever action rifle in .35 Whelen? NOT the Remington .35 but the Whelen! If so, how long ago did they make them?
No, has not been a factory chambering in .35 Whelen.
Jeff Spencer
[subject]
Monday, January 13, 2020, 15:43 (2416 days ago) @ Larry Fry
- No text -
Thanks settled that arguement!
Larry Fry
[subject]
Monday, January 13, 2020, 15:50 (2416 days ago) @ Jeff Spencer
- No text -
358 win.
Alcorn
[subject]
Tuesday, January 14, 2020, 07:25 (2416 days ago) @ Larry Fry
Can the 336 in 35 REm. be rechambered to 358 win.? If not can a 1895 be rebarreled and rechambered to 358 win.?
I make .356 Win. Brass from .444 Marlin
WB
[subject]
Tuesday, January 14, 2020, 08:04 (2415 days ago) @ Alcorn
By running it through .358 FL then cutting the neck by 50%. It could be done easily for the 336. They did them in .307 and .356. A great idea that should have but did not catch on.
32 Special & 35 Rem just fine for woods ranges, Why fuss?
Woody
[subject]
Tuesday, January 14, 2020, 11:11 (2415 days ago) @ WB
- No text -
yes. no problem on the Marlin 336.
Gary Reeder
[subject]
Tuesday, January 14, 2020, 10:23 (2415 days ago) @ Alcorn
- No text -
the 35 Whelen is based on the 30-06 case, way too long
gary reeder
[subject]
Monday, January 13, 2020, 19:00 (2416 days ago) @ Larry Fry
for the Marlin action. The only gun that would have been possible in is the Winchester 1895.
Thw 1895 would be a good candidate.
WB
[subject]
Monday, January 13, 2020, 19:37 (2416 days ago) @ gary reeder
But as close as I know it got was the .35 Winchester on effectively the .405 type case. It was hotter than the .35 Remington but not quite as potent as the modern .358 Winchester (.35 Whelen Short).
the Marlin 1895 is too short in the action for the 350 GNR
Gary Reeder
[subject]
Tuesday, January 14, 2020, 09:56 (2415 days ago) @ WB
or the 35 Whelen but the 1895 Winchester will work as it was intended for the 30-06 and 405 Winchester.
Yeah, 1895 Winchester
WB
[subject]
Tuesday, January 14, 2020, 13:34 (2415 days ago) @ Gary Reeder
I bet you never even thought of the old .35 Winchester (WCF) when you made up the higher pressure 350 GNR. The old round is lots different in profile and shoulder angle but it is interesting the parallels.
nope, I don't get into the older cartridges at all
Gary Reeder
[subject]
Tuesday, January 14, 2020, 16:02 (2415 days ago) @ WB
When I developed the 378 GNR and it was a success, I started down the next caliber and so on, going to the 350 GNR, then 338 GNR, then 8mm GNR, then 310 GNR and so on. If I had looked at the old 35 Winchester data I probably wouldn't have even done the 350 GNR as the velocities were 400 to 600 fps under what I expected out of the 350 GNR. I know you and Huey like the old stuff but I can't develop and market decent cartridges if I tell the customers it is 400 fps less than a cartridge that was out a hundred years ago.
Out of curiosity, which of the GNR
Larry Fry
[subject]
Monday, January 13, 2020, 21:59 (2416 days ago) @ gary reeder
cartridges is about the same as the .35 Whelen? I have already won $10 on the above question, but now I wonder if there is anything like the Whelen available or maybe I already have the equivalent in my Encores.
350GNR on the 405 case
Woody
[subject]
Monday, January 13, 2020, 22:35 (2416 days ago) @ Larry Fry
- No text -
the 350 GNR has 18% more case capacity than
Gary Reeder
[subject]
Tuesday, January 14, 2020, 09:54 (2415 days ago) @ Woody
the 35 Whelen so in theory it should beat it with no problem.
No factory chambering but
Sid R
[subject]
Tuesday, January 14, 2020, 06:10 (2416 days ago) @ Larry Fry
RPP (Ranger Point Precision) did chamber the 36 RPP based on the .35 Whelen. They no longer offer smithing services and only concentrate on manufacturing after market parts.