RUGER FRAMES

JT
[subject]
Monday, February 10, 2020, 15:40 (2388 days ago)

ORIGINALS
img]images/uploaded/202002102236165e41dae0f2ce4.jpg[/img][image]

FLAT-TOPS
[image][image]

LARGE FRAMES
[image][image]

Thank you JT... that's what my eyeballs

JS
[subject]
Monday, February 10, 2020, 15:50 (2388 days ago) @ JT

... needed to see.... also, do you think a revolver size Almost Exactly between a Single-Six and Blackhawk would serve any useful purpose?

IF YOU MEAN FULL-SIZED BLACKHAWK

JT
[subject]
Monday, February 10, 2020, 16:08 (2388 days ago) @ JS

WE ALREADY PRETTY MUCH HAVE IT IN THE FLAT-TOP. I HAVE A .327 ON THE LARGER FRAME AND WHILE IT IS A JOY TO SHOOT IT IS HEAVY. THE SINGLE-SIX .327 CAN BE PAINFUL SO I WOULD CERTAINLY OPT FOR A .327 BETWEEN THESE TWO CHOICES.

Sounds like JS is looking for the formula for

ChrisG
[subject]
Monday, February 10, 2020, 16:46 (2388 days ago) @ JT

the Perfect Packin' Pistol?

Naw... all this time dummy-me thought the Ruger

JS
[subject]
Monday, February 10, 2020, 16:59 (2388 days ago) @ ChrisG

... Flat-top was just the full-size BH frame without the sight "ears" up top... Not its' own frame size!! (duh)
=^)

Well actually, that's a real thing too...

Huey
[subject]
Monday, February 10, 2020, 17:02 (2388 days ago) @ JS

There has been full sized Flattop Blackhawks. No confusion in this hobby at all.

SEE THE FIRST PICTURE

JT
[subject]
Monday, February 10, 2020, 17:29 (2388 days ago) @ Huey

- No text -

Yep and they made New Models in 44 Magnum too...

Huey
[subject]
Monday, February 10, 2020, 17:35 (2388 days ago) @ JT

Think some 41 Magnums as well...

powered by my little forum