GOING BACK IN TIME 1956-58 AGAIN

JT
[subject]
Wednesday, February 12, 2020, 17:39 (2386 days ago)

Jim, in 1958. I was like 5 or 6 depending

BlackPete
[subject]
Wednesday, February 12, 2020, 17:53 (2386 days ago) @ JT

On the picture date. But my grandpa had me shooting at the age of 5.
Miss him. Pete

I'M NOT JIM NOR EVER HAVE BEEN NOR COULD BE

JT
[subject]
Wednesday, February 12, 2020, 18:05 (2386 days ago) @ BlackPete

- No text -

John!!!!!

BlackPete
[subject]
Wednesday, February 12, 2020, 18:06 (2386 days ago) @ JT

- No text -

BlackPete..put that whiskey away. LOL

Woody
[subject]
Thursday, February 13, 2020, 07:56 (2385 days ago) @ BlackPete

- No text -

"Bad Hombre"

Paul
[subject]
Wednesday, February 12, 2020, 18:17 (2385 days ago) @ JT

- No text -

lotsa memories there.

gary reeder
[subject]
Wednesday, February 12, 2020, 19:05 (2385 days ago) @ JT

- No text -

Difficult to explain to youngsters how

WB
[subject]
Wednesday, February 12, 2020, 19:18 (2385 days ago) @ JT

just taking a photograph was a very "big deal" back then. I still have a Kodak Brownie that was in my family from the late 50's. Looking in the viewfinder at about belly-button level everything is upside down! And the "flash bulbs", operated at the heat of the sun! I got burned on a couple. One learning and again on learning to be more careful!

We are from a different century!

and we thought the Polaroid was HIGH TECH.

gary reeder
[subject]
Wednesday, February 12, 2020, 19:22 (2385 days ago) @ WB

until the picture cooled down and the colors were way off and the picture faded to almost nothing in a few days.

FOR MY ARTICLES I HAVE GONE FROM

JT
[subject]
Wednesday, February 12, 2020, 19:22 (2385 days ago) @ WB

B&W PROCESSED MYSELF TO SLIDES THAT TOOK 10 DAYS TO GET BACK TO DIGITAL WHICH SAVES SO MUCH TIME AND $$$. I CAN TAKE A PICTURE AND E-MAIL IT TO THE HOME OFFICE IN JUST A FEW MINUTES.

powered by my little forum