19 Texas Rangers, Only 18 Winchesters. Why?

Jim Taylor
[subject]
Friday, November 20, 2020, 17:18 (2095 days ago)

[image]

The title of this article was the caption on an ad for the Winchester Repeating Arms Co. back in the last century. (The one that started with a "19")

The ad ran in all the major outdoors publications at the time touting the superiority of the Winchester. It showed 19 Lawmen, 18 of whom were carrying Winchester Model 1895's, while one lone Ranger was armed with a Krag.

Speculation was made (by the Winchester ad-men) if the worried look on the Krag rifleman's face was due to the fact that he did not have a Winchester.

Then someone ruined the whole thing.

Some history buff somewhere pointed out to Winchester that these were not Texas Rangers, but were in actuality THE ARIZONA RANGERS! It seems the photo had been taken around 1901 in the mining towns of Clifton and Morenci, Arizona during a strike at the mine. The Rangers had been called in to keep the peace.

An insult had been offered the State of Arizona. What was Winchester to do but 'fess up and try to make it good.

They ran ads in all the same outdoors magazines apologizing for the oversight and to make amends for the crime of calling Arizona Rangers by that other name, they offered a copy of the now-infamous photo to anyone who would write and request it.

Being interested in history I ordered a copy. Some years later I put it on a board and decoupaged it. It hangs in a place of honor in my reloading shop.

Note the 5th Ranger from the right.. the lone wolf with the Krag. Ya gotta love a guy who does not go along with the crowd!

For a larger picture, use this link
http://leverguns.com/articles/images/rangers.jpg

My pop had a brothers-in-law who was

Brant
[subject]
Friday, November 20, 2020, 19:53 (2095 days ago) @ Jim Taylor

some type of Texas lawman. I remember my Uncle Don as an impressive man of stature and speech. He had a friend that was an old retired Texas Ranger that he invited over once so Pop could meet him. This was before I was born. He said when the old fella sat down at the kitchen table for coffee, he pulled an old Colt single action from his waist band no holster and laid it on the table. This was in the mid to late 60s. I would love to have been there to listen to his stories. I would have asked him 1000 questions about just that revolver!

They don't make them like that anymore,

Darryl T.
[subject]
Saturday, November 21, 2020, 13:07 (2094 days ago) @ Brant

My grandpa was born in the 1890's. Tough as leather farmer. Was able to absorb alot from him. He had cigar boxes of rattles he took off snakes he killed on his farm. This was in upstate NY. They went to the museum in Rochester. None left here now.

BRIAN PEARCE'S GRANDDAD WAS AN ARIZONA RANGER

JT
[subject]
Saturday, November 21, 2020, 09:32 (2094 days ago) @ Jim Taylor

- No text -

your eyes are a lot better than mine if you can see

Gary Reeder
[subject]
Saturday, November 21, 2020, 10:41 (2094 days ago) @ Jim Taylor

some of those rifles. Some I can tell right off that they are 1895s but some I can barely even see a gun. Some of the Rangers look like they had a bad night. And I suppose you can tell what gun the guy at the top of the stairs is carrying.

The original photo is quite a bit larger ..

Jim Taylor
[subject]
Saturday, November 21, 2020, 14:58 (2094 days ago) @ Gary Reeder

The guy at the top of the stairs is carrying a Texas Rangers Classic by Reeder Custom Guns.

I thought that was what it was, but wasn't sure.

Gary Reeder
[subject]
Saturday, November 21, 2020, 15:43 (2094 days ago) @ Jim Taylor

- No text -

Dang sure nothing wrong with a Krag!

Blake
[subject]
Sunday, November 22, 2020, 05:41 (2093 days ago) @ Jim Taylor

For my taste the 1895 is a bit on the heavy sine for a lever gun. I liked it fine in 405 Winchester but think the Krag would be a great gun for a Ranger. The 30-40 world do anything a lawman or frontiers man of the day would need. Cool picture and story. Thanks for sharing
$.02

I always liked the Krag. Had one as a teenager.

Jim Taylor
[subject]
Sunday, November 22, 2020, 06:39 (2093 days ago) @ Blake

The 1895 sounds like a boxcar uncoupling when you work the action. Neat gun but not as handy as Model 1894.

Hard to beat the 94 for handiness the 1886 and the

Blake
[subject]
Sunday, November 22, 2020, 16:49 (2093 days ago) @ Jim Taylor

Model 71 even being big bores are handier than the 1895. That being said l still have an appreciation for the design of the 1895.

I had the Model 71 and an '86 .45-70

Jim Taylor
[subject]
Sunday, November 22, 2020, 18:42 (2093 days ago) @ Blake

I liked the 71 best of the two. Took it to Africa.

Yep the 71 is tops. I had one in 450 Alaskan

Blake
[subject]
Sunday, November 22, 2020, 19:14 (2093 days ago) @ Jim Taylor

It was a great shooter. I tuck it to Alaska too. I ended up selling it to a dealer at a gun show in Atlanta. He talked me out of it. It all started over a conversation on elk hunting out west, it was about the time I started hunting with a hand gun in earnest. Late 90’s. Bought my first Reeder a year or two after that. A Long Colt Hunter!

powered by my little forum