I know that the Trail Gun is available in 10mm and 40 S&W. Could the Trail Gun be chambered in 10mm Magnum?
From my 7.5" Single Seven, the cylinder measured 1.456" and the rim on .327 Federal Magnum is 0.055". This implies that a lower bound for the maximum OAL of a cartridge that may fit is 1.511". I took five-cartridge samples of three 10mm Magnum loads from Double Tap (the only factory loads that I am aware of), measured their OAL, and I got the following results:
. . . . . . . 230gr Hardcast
. . . Max: 1.5125"
. . . Min: 1.507"
. . . Avg: 1.5107"
. . . . . . . 200gr Hardcast
. . . Max: 1.4915"
. . . Min: 1.489"
. . . Avg: 1.4899"
. . . . . . . 135gr JHP "Controlled Expansion"
. . . Max: 1.5105"
. . . Min: 1.508"
. . . Avg: 1.5092"
It looks like the 200gr and 135gr would fit, and a few of the longest loaded 230gr may not. To be sure, the 230gr would certainly fit if: (1) the headspace allowed an amount of the cartridge equal to the thickness of the rim plus a couple thou (i.e., a fraction of the thickness of any moonclip) to hang out the backside of the cylinder; or (2) the cylinder were a couple thou longer and the barrel extension a couple thou shorter. Of course, since this is mostly a handload cartridge, proper bullet seating depth makes this academic.
Putting aside fitment, the more important question may be, what happens when you fire such a cartridge in one of these little guns? There are some factory 10mm Auto loads (e.g., Buffalo Bore Heavy Outdoorsman 220gr @ 703 ft-lb and Heavy 180gr @ 728 ft-lb) that come close to the bottom of these Doubletap 10mm Magnum loads (230gr @ 798 ft-lb) but the other 10mm Magnum loads are ~1000 ft-lb. My Single Seven weighs only 38.4 oz. I imagine recoil would be stout.
(1) Would this gun be able to handle 10mm Magnum?
(2) Would the average shooter be able to handle it?
-
Trail Gun 10mm Magnum?
- Keith, 2020-12-06, 16:44
-
now that you have gone to all that trouble it doesn't mean
- gary reeder, 2020-12-06, 22:42
-
our test gun was a 5 1/2" Redhawk. (nm)
- gary reeder, 2020-12-06, 22:45
-
While it’s possible it’s not as much fun.
- WB, 2020-12-07, 11:37
-
I've seen a 41 Magnum built on an O.M. Single Six...
- Huey, 2020-12-07, 12:31
-
To do another I'd go .38 Super, a GNR superb idea.
- WB, 2020-12-07, 13:24
- our very first Trail Gun wasn't really a - gary reeder, 2020-12-07, 20:11
-
My first Trail Gun was a 38 Super...
- Huey, 2020-12-07, 13:42
-
I figured a 9 would set back easily
- WB, 2020-12-07, 14:28
- But now you mention it..., - WB, 2020-12-07, 14:29
-
I figured a 9 would set back easily
- WB, 2020-12-07, 14:28
-
To do another I'd go .38 Super, a GNR superb idea.
- WB, 2020-12-07, 13:24
-
I've seen a 41 Magnum built on an O.M. Single Six...
- Huey, 2020-12-07, 12:31
-
While it’s possible it’s not as much fun.
- WB, 2020-12-07, 11:37
-
our test gun was a 5 1/2" Redhawk. (nm)
- gary reeder, 2020-12-06, 22:45
-
now that you have gone to all that trouble it doesn't mean
- gary reeder, 2020-12-06, 22:42