Got to shoot just a bit this afternoon...

WB
[subject]
Sunday, January 03, 2021, 17:30 (2050 days ago)

I ordered (specifically) an inexpensive 3-9x 32mm scope off Amazon. I needed a smaller objective to fit my rings and Marlin 783 without touching the barrel or rear sight. Well I got in a 40mm. I guess they thought they were giving me an upgrade?!

It didn’t fit. So I stuck it on my Volquartsen barreled 10/22. Sighting it in was easy. It does shoot well. Re-sighting the .22 Magnum with some very fast Winchester 30 gr. JHP (2250 fps). It groups about 1/2” at 25 yds. Moving to 100 yds. I typically get two shots within an inch of each other, then one that opens the group some to just under 2”. If I keep at it they generally open to 3” or so.

I know it’s not a target rifle, never intended to be. But I’ve had clip fed models that shot 1.5” groups easily. That’s my goal for the tube repeater.

I meant to say I’m going to glass bed it

WB
[subject]
Sunday, January 03, 2021, 17:35 (2050 days ago) @ WB

There is only one stock bolt on a round pillar. I think I can shim the front and bed in front and behind the one point. Then tightening that bolt will bed the action and float the front with the tube.

That’s the plan anyway.

I like the .22 Magnum! The Ruger American .22 Mag

Jim Taylor
[subject]
Sunday, January 03, 2021, 18:06 (2050 days ago) @ WB

will shoot one ragged hole IF the shooter wouldn't shake so much!

[image]

At 130 yards

[image]

I’ve heard the plastic Rugers really shoot.

WB
[subject]
Sunday, January 03, 2021, 18:15 (2050 days ago) @ Jim Taylor

I can sell the old walnut stocked Marlin for enough to buy a new Ruger. But if I could tune the old beast to shoot well under 2” at 100 I’d be happy. I’d then spring for a good scope. It’s wearing an old 4x Bushnell now. I need a little more magnification, maybe a good 2-7x.

I traded into this one ...

Jim Taylor
[subject]
Sunday, January 03, 2021, 18:44 (2050 days ago) @ WB

cut the barrel to 16" ...

[image]

Hey if it works... I like the .17 HMR a bunch myself

WB
[subject]
Sunday, January 03, 2021, 20:04 (2050 days ago) @ Jim Taylor

I find the ammo more accurate than .22 WMR of the past. I have a Savage 93v HB that honestly will shoot 1/2 MOA. When it’s not windy. But it weighs 10 lbs!

If you are a Hillbilly there is a rule you have to own a .22 WMR.

YES IT WILL! CZ AND SAVAGE ALSO GREAT

JT
[subject]
Sunday, January 03, 2021, 19:08 (2050 days ago) @ Jim Taylor

- No text -

Typical first (3) at 100 yds., heating up same distance.

WB
[subject]
Sunday, January 03, 2021, 18:10 (2050 days ago) @ WB

I have Marlins that are 1/2” at 50 with open sights.

Sid R
[subject]
Monday, January 04, 2021, 09:17 (2050 days ago) @ WB

I have a Savage 93 that does that at 100 with a scope. Most rifles don’t need to be bedded, just a good free float is all they need. I sand the stocks where needed.

That is the problem with the tube feed Mariln

WB
[subject]
Monday, January 04, 2021, 14:50 (2049 days ago) @ Sid R

It is basically teeter-totter in the stock with that one mid-point stock bolt. I need to fabricate a bed that forces it to "totter" only one direction. Not only am I floating the barrel but the magazine feeding tube under it as well. I don't think the receiver will be stressed. It's mostly a solid tube of steel with that bedding pillar at the front of it.

[image]

My 881 22 or just sand and even torque.

Sid R
[subject]
Monday, January 04, 2021, 17:19 (2049 days ago) @ WB

- No text -

powered by my little forum