I got some credible .32-20 revolver data

WB
[subject]
Monday, January 04, 2021, 23:26 (2049 days ago)

From the 1960 Lyman #42 Manual. The power levels were the range I was searching for. Testing to obtain shooting to fixed sight elevation will begin soon. I’m not keen sawing on this rig’s sight. FWIW.

[image]

I use 5.5 grns Unique behind a 100 grn SWC...

Huey
[subject]
Tuesday, January 05, 2021, 05:23 (2049 days ago) @ WB

In my little Uberti Stallion/P Jr. It's worked just fine for me for years.

That's been my 'standard' load behind

Russell Cottle
[subject]
Tuesday, January 05, 2021, 08:03 (2049 days ago) @ Huey

the old Lyman 3108 for years.

Sounds a little zippy!

WB
[subject]
Tuesday, January 05, 2021, 08:08 (2049 days ago) @ Russell Cottle

I used to load 5.5 Grs. of Unique with a 158 gr. SWC in my .38 Specials back in the late 1970's. Later the manuals changed it into a .357 Magnum level loading! I'm not sure if the powder changed or they just reevaluated the liability concern.

Might be for your old Colt

Russell Cottle
[subject]
Tuesday, January 05, 2021, 10:32 (2048 days ago) @ WB

- No text -

I’ve used 4.5 of Unique with good results

steve todd
[subject]
Tuesday, January 05, 2021, 10:50 (2048 days ago) @ WB

On rabbits. That’s with a 30 Carbine Ruger using 32-20 brass and a Magnus bullet.
I agree with JT and Jim, real black powder works great for everything. Also seems to me, that real black powder is either easier to clean, or less corrosive than the black powder substitutes (everything is a substitute, but smokeless powder is an exception to the easy cleaning). Tripple7 you really need to watch, it imbeds and starts corroding. I stopped using Tripple7 after getting corrosion in two pistols, after cleaning and checking the next day, then putting them away for a long while (over 6 months).

Brian Pearce had a nice 32-20 article for

ChrisG
[subject]
Tuesday, January 05, 2021, 05:23 (2049 days ago) @ WB

revolvers back in '14 or '15. Split it into 3 pressure categories. All revolvers, Sw's with heat treated cylinders, and Colt SAA.

Thanks, I think I have that someplace.

WB
[subject]
Tuesday, January 05, 2021, 05:36 (2049 days ago) @ ChrisG

- No text -

Handloader 290...

Huey
[subject]
Tuesday, January 05, 2021, 05:42 (2049 days ago) @ WB

- No text -

Thanks Huey, a great help. I'm hoping to

WB
[subject]
Tuesday, January 05, 2021, 07:55 (2049 days ago) @ Huey

begin work on the ancient Colt SAA. My objective is to find a close to traditional load that hits to the sights. I have not had a chance to slug the bore or pin gauge the cylinder throats.

I once had a New Service in .38-40 that squeezed the bullets down to about 0.398" then they rattled down a 0.403" bore. My solution was to enlarge the throats to be more compatible with the bore and use appropriate bullets. The results went from keyholing to actual groups. I learned a lot.

Another trick may be to use softer bullets that even after being squeezed through tight throats will bump up after slamming into the barrel throat as they are pushed down the bore. I think that is plausible. I am tempted to order the 98 gr. HBWC to do my initial shooting and also use for my other .32 wheelgun needs in .32 Long through .327. I feel the hollow base skirt would adapt and help with some minor flaws. Although I sure do like the traditional .32-20 115 gr. Flat Nose tough. I need to pick only one to start, order (500).

I found blackpowder to work really well in the 32-20

Jim Taylor
[subject]
Tuesday, January 05, 2021, 08:49 (2049 days ago) @ WB

I am not sure because I did not test it much, but it seems to act almost like a wad under the bullet and helps undersize bullets slug up. At least I thought it did.

I found blackpowder to be accurate in the 480 Achilles .. with its undersize heel.

BLACK POWDER ALSO WORKS WELL IN

JT
[subject]
Tuesday, January 05, 2021, 08:50 (2049 days ago) @ Jim Taylor

WELL EVERYTHING!

WAITING TO SEE YOUR RESULTS WITH #6 AND

JT
[subject]
Tuesday, January 05, 2021, 08:42 (2049 days ago) @ WB

5066 (MY FIRST POWDER USED IN 1956)

By golly if it costs this much for the can empty

WB
[subject]
Tuesday, January 05, 2021, 12:54 (2048 days ago) @ JT

it must be pretty pricey stuff full. One was $18 the other was $29 not including tax or shipping! The #42 Lyman manual hails from 1960 so I guess they still made it. I was made in 1963, almost 58 years ago so that was a good bit ago. I have seen pictures of you and that old (Buick?) out shooting in the country. Those must have been taken about that time.

[image]

[image]

'58 CHEVY

JT
[subject]
Tuesday, January 05, 2021, 14:14 (2048 days ago) @ WB

- No text -

powered by my little forum