and has very little to do with anything else. If you feel it works the best for you and that you shoot it the best, it'll work for you pretty well.
-
Article on Colt 400 mag?
- SPB, 2022-02-07, 08:43
-
Lee Martin is well known on here and respected by
- Gary Reeder, 2022-02-07, 10:48
-
HE MAY HAVE WRITTEN THAT BEFORE
- JT, 2022-02-07, 11:22
- Martin's article dated - Burban, 2022-02-08, 09:26
- That was a bit flippant but a good while back - WB, 2022-02-07, 11:22
-
HE MAY HAVE WRITTEN THAT BEFORE
- JT, 2022-02-07, 11:22
-
I kinda wish the .400 came to pass as the
- Lynn, 2022-02-07, 10:46
- In my research it seems about 1960 - WB, 2022-02-07, 11:34
-
BUT .010" MAKES THAT MUCH DIFFERENCE? (nm)
- JT, 2022-02-07, 11:24
-
only 2 1/2 % difference in frontal area. Would need
- Southern Boy, 2022-02-07, 14:59
-
Which is better .264, .270, 7mm, .30?
- WB, 2022-02-07, 15:30
- It's the one that you have the most personal confidence in - Jim Taylor, 2022-02-07, 16:05
- I vote the 36x26x36. (nm) - Southern Boy, 2022-02-07, 15:47
-
Which is better .264, .270, 7mm, .30?
- WB, 2022-02-07, 15:30
- There could be a small argument of penetration - WB, 2022-02-07, 11:57
-
only 2 1/2 % difference in frontal area. Would need
- Southern Boy, 2022-02-07, 14:59
-
I'm a .400 fan. The .401 Herter's could
- WB, 2022-02-07, 10:01
-
GORDON BOSER
- JT, 2022-02-07, 10:17
-
BOSER'S .401 IBULLET IN .38-40 & 10MM
- JT, 2022-02-07, 10:31
- .400 - Alcorn, 2022-02-07, 21:25
-
BOSER'S .401 IBULLET IN .38-40 & 10MM
- JT, 2022-02-07, 10:31
-
GORDON BOSER
- JT, 2022-02-07, 10:17
-
Lee Martin is well known on here and respected by
- Gary Reeder, 2022-02-07, 10:48