John Browning
jthomson
[subject]
Wednesday, February 16, 2022, 12:21 (1632 days ago)
How did I not know this before this year?
ChrisG
[subject]
Wednesday, February 16, 2022, 13:54 (1631 days ago) @ jthomson
- No text -
Thank you Jon! Great history.
SPB
[subject]
Wednesday, February 16, 2022, 13:55 (1631 days ago) @ jthomson
and Browning wasn't satisfied with the 1911
Gary Reeder
[subject]
Wednesday, February 16, 2022, 14:09 (1631 days ago) @ SPB
even though the military immediately placed a large order for them. Within a couple of days he started working on a gun he felt would replace the 1911. That was the Browning Hi Power finished in 1935 shortly after Browning's death. It was called the P-35.
That's a pretty nice one too. Beavertail, round hammer,
WB
[subject]
Wednesday, February 16, 2022, 14:11 (1631 days ago) @ jthomson
Novacks, and I note a flat mainspring housing coupled with a short trigger. Must be for smaller hands, like mine. It also has the ejection port relieved for case clearance. I always thought it kept dings out of the brass. Kase seems to think it's more of a gimmick, I think. The boy's sharp on the 1911.
All those points trying to make a better mousetrap than JMB figured. He died in 1927, before the P35-HP (1935) could be finalized.
I also read the firing pin retention plate on Browning's original patent has a "flat" bottom". Most modern guns today have a taper on the bottom. This makes cycling the slide notably easier. I read that changing that back to Browning's original design (pre WWI) can help prevent slide battering in recoil. Supposedly a good trick for 10mm 1911's. Some Army guys complained and the military changed this flat bottom to a taper as we most know it today.
![[image]](images/uploaded/20220216192055620d4e97be73f.jpg)