here is how it is worded...
"Other opponents of establishing a monument have argued it won’t help combat a lingering drought and could prevent thinning of forests and stop hunters from keeping wildlife populations in check. Ranchers in Utah near the Arizona border say the monument designation would strip them of privately owned land."
That doesn't speak well for hunters or land owners in the million acres.
-
Our wonderful Gvt has today turned over a million acres
- Gary Reeder, 2023-08-11, 14:40
![[*]](themes/default/images/complete_thread.png "Open whole thread")
-
I don't know if it stays National Forest or National
- Gary Reeder, 2023-08-11, 14:48
-
It’s to be administered by the NPS
- Shawn D, 2023-08-11, 15:11
- If that is true (and I don't doubt it) then those of us that - Gary Reeder, 2023-08-11, 15:23
- It looks like it will be designated National Monument - Gary Reeder, 2023-08-11, 15:08
-
One paragraph in the monument bill bothers me a lot
- Gary Reeder, 2023-08-11, 15:04
-
It was a "monumental" gift to Putin.
- John W, 2023-08-12, 03:06
- Damn, I forgot about that. That will make Putin happy. (nm) - Gary Reeder, 2023-08-12, 15:11
-
It was a "monumental" gift to Putin.
- John W, 2023-08-12, 03:06
-
It’s to be administered by the NPS
- Shawn D, 2023-08-11, 15:11
-
I don't know if it stays National Forest or National
- Gary Reeder, 2023-08-11, 14:48