I foolishly placed hard wood grips on mine. It stings bad. I tried various loads, even 200 gr. duplicates of military .38 S&W/200 at 550-600 fps. Really rough, I think it is more of a longer duration of the recoil impulse perhaps. With no weight of the chassis (12 oz.) the recoil speed is lots faster than a 24 oz. std. model. I'm now back to old standard 158 gr. JHP are usually a waste with minimal expansion, except in adds and magazine articles, minimal. I have some AA#7 and 1680 I might try but the fps is limited within a physics bracket no matter.
-
Shooting the S&W 340
- Jim Taylor, 2018-02-14, 14:39
- I have that same gun, with a visable hammer, in .38 Spec. - WB, 2018-02-15, 07:36
-
Nice Jim. Looks like a Waterboy video. (nm)
- SPB, 2018-02-14, 16:02
-
LOL you see my inspiration. He did some
- WB, 2018-02-15, 07:27
-
Jim, now we know who to blame for WB as you were
- Gary Reeder, 2018-02-15, 20:36
- It may be partially true - Jim Taylor, 2018-02-16, 15:32
-
Jim, now we know who to blame for WB as you were
- Gary Reeder, 2018-02-15, 20:36
-
LOL you see my inspiration. He did some
- WB, 2018-02-15, 07:27
- Nice! Also doubles as a Flare Gun, Hot-Dog Roaster, etc. (nm) - ~JM~, 2018-02-14, 15:00
-
Quite the difference in muzzle flashes. (nm)
- JPL, 2018-02-14, 14:48
- Even the Pic blinded me! (nm) - ChrisG, 2018-02-14, 17:18
- Even if you miss you’ll blind the bad guy, neat pictures. (nm) - Brent Foy, 2018-02-14, 14:57
-
Difference in recoil also ... (nm)
- Jim Taylor, 2018-02-14, 14:49
- Love that Ring-o-fire!! (nm) - Drdougrx, 2018-02-14, 18:35