41 GNR Conversion - 657 or Redhawk

Shawn Davis
[subject]
Friday, February 01, 2019, 19:58 (2771 days ago)

Been kicking around the idea of a 41 GNR for a while now but I'm having trouble coming to a decision on a base gun. Looking for a 5-6" barrel DA revolver in stainless so I've narrowed it down to the S&W 657 and the Redhawk. I like the feel of the N frame revolvers but I have several Redhawk/ Super Redhawks and love the robust design.

Which one & why please?

Post reply
 

RH are strong. Have one in 410 GNR and is tops in my book

Kyle
[subject]
Friday, February 01, 2019, 22:25 (2771 days ago) @ Shawn Davis

- No text -

Post reply
 

like John Taffin says, the Smith is the racehorse

Gary Reeder
[subject]
Friday, February 01, 2019, 23:14 (2771 days ago) @ Kyle

the Redhawk is the workhorse. Or something to that effect..

Post reply
 

THOROBREDS AND CLYDESDALES

JT
[subject]
Saturday, February 02, 2019, 11:13 (2770 days ago) @ Gary Reeder

- No text -

Post reply
 

yeah, that's it.

Gary Reeder
[subject]
Saturday, February 02, 2019, 11:50 (2770 days ago) @ JT

- No text -

Post reply
 

Buy them like tires....

T-Martin
[subject]
Saturday, February 02, 2019, 13:52 (2770 days ago) @ Gary Reeder

Two Smiths for the front (41GNR & 410GNR) and two RedHawks for the back (41GNR & 410GNR). Vary barrel lengths to your liking!

Post reply
 

I have a 5.5" .410 GNR-- If you go with a Rhawk

Lynn
[subject]
Saturday, February 02, 2019, 10:30 (2770 days ago) @ Shawn Davis

you could consider this as the power level is way above a .41 GNR. With 4227 it is surprisingly pleasant to shoot
mv are in the 1300 with a 250 gr bullet
H110,296 really wake this round up now you are up to what GNR has in his manual.
Around 1600 with a 255 gr
I had a blue 5.5" 41 GNR and now My SS 5.5".410 both are very good

Post reply
 
powered by my little forum