Am I the only one having a long-held suspicion that Ruger (or others) would be well served with a frame size somewhere between the big bulky BH and 'petite' Single Six?... just put the two side by side and ponder the 'gulf' between these existing 'platforms.' Yes, decades of people have "made-do" with the two, but imagine what could be creatively done taking full advantage of that sweet spot...
-
Ruger SA Frames
- JS, 2020-02-10, 14:13
-
IN THE BEGINNING RUGER
- JT, 2020-02-10, 15:25
- Thanks JT, the Fog has lifted! (nm) - JS, 2020-02-10, 15:32
-
Well, there's the Ruger Midframe, FA97 and a host of...
- Huey, 2020-02-10, 14:16
- Ruger "midframe" - JS, 2020-02-10, 14:59
- Loving my flattop .45...Svelte compared to a - ChrisG, 2020-02-10, 14:47
-
Saw a thread some where on the new Vaquero being
- Bucky, 2020-02-10, 14:38
- Must have been the Old Vaquero, did see a 500 Lb online (nm) - Bucky, 2020-02-10, 16:10
-
don't believe it. Way back in the mid '90s we
- Gary Reeder, 2020-02-10, 14:54
-
Have to agree and even worse when they add S&W Sights...
- Huey, 2020-02-10, 15:12
- that conversion I really don't understand. We - Gary Reeder, 2020-02-10, 16:02
-
Have to agree and even worse when they add S&W Sights...
- Huey, 2020-02-10, 15:12
- I've seen them in 480 Ruger and 50 GI... (nm) - Huey, 2020-02-10, 14:45
-
IN THE BEGINNING RUGER
- JT, 2020-02-10, 15:25