Reeder Custom Guns - Yep. It's the bases on the fluorescents that are problematic

WB
Yep. It's the bases on the fluorescents that are problematic
Tuesday, January 02, 2024, 08:25

They have also made us convert all our utility fluorescents to some type of new internal ballast types. Supposed to save money. I do not miss the tar filled ballasts that are so prone to shorting out. We spent something like $65,000 in doing so. They gave us a Govt. sponsored credit but we were still out some $30k. They had it figured that the "pay back" would only take a few years. Then we are supposed to be realizing a real savings.

Don't get me started on our solar field the utility has interest in. Acres and acres tied up in it. What a Ponzi scheme. Mostly making money for someone else.

Well they did it!! Gary and I warned it was coming. - Jim Taylor, 2024-01-02, 05:57
- Always need incandescent bulbs on the farm - JD, 2024-01-02, 21:21
  - Yep, and heat boxes for fiberglass layups - steve todd, 2024-01-02, 23:45
- I am against "banning" anything but from my experience - WB, 2024-01-02, 08:08
  - BTW they slid in several new executive orders and such too - WB, 2024-01-02, 08:18
  - LED's do use less electricity ... BUT - Jim Taylor, 2024-01-02, 08:15
    - Yep. It's the bases on the fluorescents that are problematic - WB, 2024-01-02, 08:25
      - Incandescdent bulbs are little heaters - john ammeter, 2024-01-03, 07:25
      - Not to mention, what do you do with the - John W, 2024-01-03, 06:29